Responses
We had seventeen responses which is about half the
membership I think. There was very little consistency in responses. Given the small pool and variety of answers
analysis is therefore somewhat abstract.
Scales
Seven people preferred 28mm, five people 15mm and one person
6mm. However one person preferred both
15mm and 28mm and one person preferred both 6mm and 15mm. When second preference is considered nine people
effectively indicated the scales they had not selected as their first
preference or simply said all. As part
of second preference, 20mm, 25mm and 1/72nd were also mentioned.
This part of the survey did not ask what figure collections
people had. My conclusion is that while
an individual might prefer 28mm or 15mm, they are happy to game in either scale
and this includes 6mm, 20mm and 1/72nd.
There was only one response that implied 28mm and nothing else.
Rules
Preferred rules mentioned: General
de Brigade, La Salle, Napoleon's Battles, Black Powder, Marshal's Baton (a local
rule set) and Column of March. Three
people mentioned General Brigade, the others were mentioned by one person
each. Four people responded that they
were happy to play any rules while the remaining five indicated they were not
active Napoleonic players.
When it came to second preferences two
people mentioned General de Brigade, one person Black Powder and one Marshal's
Baton with six saying any and four saying none.
Other rules mentioned included Empire, Sharpe's Practice, March Attack,
Shako, Grand Manner, Field of Glory and Songs of Drums and Shakos. Players of Slaughterloo, what could be described
as fantasy Napoleonics, have also been observed at the club, but this was not
picked up by the survey.
There was no correlation between
preferred scale and preferred rules.
Bicentenary Event
People were asked if they wanted a big game, display game or
smaller game. An overwhelming fifteen
wanted a big game, with only one saying no and another saying maybe (the later
due to availability on the date).
There
were seven positive responses for a static display and eight negative with two
maybes.
There were seven negative responses to participation in a
smaller game, mainly from people who were not active Napoleonic players. There were four maybes and six positive
responses.
Relevant comments suggested a static display of 54mm figures
and using Sharpe's Practice for a skirmish game. There is also the need to have someone to
welcome visitors on the day, this could also cover the need to have crib sheets
for any casual gamers.
Observations
My initial reaction to what to make of the survey results
were FIIK.
There is no definitive result that would lead me to say that
people want a big bicentennial game in a particular scale using a specific set
of scale.
Clearly there is an interest in doing something, but diversification
in the player base makes a single solution a challenge, particularly when the
logistics of organising a big game are taken into account.
My conclusion is to work with the nine people (and the four
maybes) who expressed a willingness to be involved in the sub-committee for the
NWS Waterloo 2015 event.
I came across this thread on TMP asking "What is your Napoleonic rules progression?"
ReplyDeletehttp://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=188678